Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1050 Max-Q vs Arc A310

Verdict
GTX 1050 Max-Q vs Arc A310: Arc A310 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1050 Max-QArc A310Difference
3DMark Time Spy4551,289-64.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2328-17.9%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1115-26.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K68-25.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.33.1-57.7%
VRAM2 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112112
TDP (W)3375
  • Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.
  • GTX 1050 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 75W).

Verdict: GTX 1050 Max-Q or Arc A310?

Our recommendation
Arc A310 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 1050 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+56%)

Arc A310 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+27%)
  • 4K gaming (+25%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+65%)
  • Video memory (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1050 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p.

GTX 1050 Max-Q vs Arc A310: which should you choose?

GTX 1050 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2016, Pascal) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.

Arc A310 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $110.

GTX 1050 Max-Q vs Arc A310: Arc A310 is faster for gaming. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. GTX 1050 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 75W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A310 averages 15 fps against 11. At 4K (6 vs 8 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 33 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1050 Max-Q better than the Arc A310?

Arc A310 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1050 Max-Q and the Arc A310?

Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. GTX 1050 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 75W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1050 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1050 Max-Q profile → Arc A310 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons