GT 710 vs Arc A310
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GT 710 | Arc A310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 129 | 1,289 | -90.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 20 | 28 | -28.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 10 | 15 | -33.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 8 | -37.5% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4 | 3.1 | -87.9% |
| VRAM | 2 GB DDR3 | 4 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 16 | 112 | -85.7% |
| TDP (W) | 19 | 75 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $35 | $110 | -68.2% |
- Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 10 fps — about 33% faster.
- GT 710 draws less power (19W vs 75W).
Verdict: GT 710 or Arc A310?
GT 710 advantages
- Power efficiency (+75%)
- Affordability (+68%)
Arc A310 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+33%)
- 4K gaming (+38%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+86%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GT 710 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GT 710 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
Arc A310 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GT 710 vs Arc A310: which should you choose?
GT 710 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Kepler) with 2 GB of DDR3, averaging 10 fps at 1440p; launched at $35.
Arc A310 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $110.
GT 710 vs Arc A310: Arc A310 is faster for gaming. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 10 fps — about 33% faster. GT 710 draws less power (19W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A310 averages 15 fps against 10. At 4K (5 vs 8 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 19 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $35 vs $110, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GT 710 better than the Arc A310?
Arc A310 takes the overall edge, though GT 710 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 10 fps — about 33% faster.
What is the main difference between the GT 710 and the Arc A310?
Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 10 fps — about 33% faster. GT 710 draws less power (19W vs 75W).
Which is better value?
Arc A310 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GT 710 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.