BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs Arc B750
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BXT-32-1024 MC4 | Arc B750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,500 | 7,224 | -37.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 65 | 68 | -4.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 38 | 41 | -7.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 15 | 23 | -34.8% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 102 | 448 | -77.1% |
| TDP (W) | 5 | 225 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.5 | 2.6 | -42.3% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 25 | 35 | -28.6% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 7% faster.
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 225W).
Verdict: BXT-32-1024 MC4 or Arc B750?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 advantages
- Power efficiency (+98%)
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+7%)
- 4K gaming (+35%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+38%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+77%)
- AI image generation (+42%)
- Local LLM inference (+29%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs Arc B750: which should you choose?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2020, Rogue Architecture) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs Arc B750: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 7% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 38. At 4K (15 vs 23 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc B750 is quicker for AI image generation (2.6 vs 1.5 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 25 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 5 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BXT-32-1024 MC4 better than the Arc B750?
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 7% faster.
What is the main difference between the BXT-32-1024 MC4 and the Arc B750?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 7% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.