BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs Arc A570M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BXT-32-1024 MC4 | Arc A570M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,500 | 2,234 | +101.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 65 | 34 | +91.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 38 | 19 | +100.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 15 | 10 | +50.0% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 102 | 224 | -54.3% |
| TDP (W) | 5 | 75 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.5 | 0.8 | +87.5% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 25 | 11 | +127.3% |
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 100% faster.
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 75W).
Verdict: BXT-32-1024 MC4 or Arc A570M?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+50%)
- 4K gaming (+33%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+50%)
- AI image generation (+47%)
- Local LLM inference (+56%)
- Power efficiency (+93%)
Arc A570M advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+54%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc A570M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2020, Rogue Architecture) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs Arc A570M: BXT-32-1024 MC4 is faster for gaming. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 100% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps against 19. At 4K (15 vs 10 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the BXT-32-1024 MC4 is quicker for AI image generation (1.5 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (25 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 5 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BXT-32-1024 MC4 better than the Arc A570M?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 100% faster.
What is the main difference between the BXT-32-1024 MC4 and the Arc A570M?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 100% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A570M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.