Arc Pro A60M vs RX M Vega 64
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc Pro A60M | RX M Vega 64 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 3,766 | -40.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 45 | -24.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 26 | -26.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 14 | -28.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.3 | 10.8 | -50.6% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB HBM2 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 410 | -45.4% |
| TDP (W) | 95 | 191 | — |
- RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 27% faster.
- Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 191W).
Verdict: Arc Pro A60M or RX M Vega 64?
Arc Pro A60M advantages
- Power efficiency (+50%)
RX M Vega 64 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+27%)
- 4K gaming (+29%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+41%)
- Memory bandwidth (+45%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you game at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M vs RX M Vega 64: which should you choose?
Arc Pro A60M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
RX M Vega 64 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M vs RX M Vega 64: RX M Vega 64 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 27% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 191W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 14 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 95 W versus 191 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro A60M better than the RX M Vega 64?
RX M Vega 64 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 27% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc Pro A60M and the RX M Vega 64?
RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 27% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 191W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.