Arc Pro A60M vs RTX 4080 Super Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc Pro A60M | RTX 4080 Super Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 14,624 | -84.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 117 | -70.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 73 | -74.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 41 | -75.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.3 | 36.6 | -85.4% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6X | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 672 | -66.7% |
| TDP (W) | 95 | 144 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.8 | 14.6 | -94.5% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 53 | -79.2% |
- RTX 4080 Super Max-Q averages 73 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 74% faster.
- Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 144W).
Verdict: Arc Pro A60M or RTX 4080 Super Max-Q?
Arc Pro A60M advantages
- Power efficiency (+34%)
RTX 4080 Super Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+74%)
- 4K gaming (+76%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+85%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+67%)
- AI image generation (+95%)
- Local LLM inference (+79%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 4080 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M vs RTX 4080 Super Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc Pro A60M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
RTX 4080 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2024, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 73 fps at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M vs RTX 4080 Super Max-Q: RTX 4080 Super Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 4080 Super Max-Q averages 73 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 74% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 144W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4080 Super Max-Q averages 73 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 41 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4080 Super Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (14.6 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (53 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 95 W versus 144 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro A60M better than the RTX 4080 Super Max-Q?
RTX 4080 Super Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4080 Super Max-Q averages 73 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 74% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc Pro A60M and the RTX 4080 Super Max-Q?
RTX 4080 Super Max-Q averages 73 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 74% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 144W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 4080 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.