Arc Pro A60M vs H100 PCIe 80GB
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc Pro A60M | H100 PCIe 80GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 17,927 | -87.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 141 | -75.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 89 | -78.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 50 | -80.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.3 | 51.2 | -89.6% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 80 GB HBM2e | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 2,000 | -88.8% |
| TDP (W) | 95 | 350 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.8 | 20.5 | -96.1% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 143 | -92.3% |
- H100 PCIe 80GB averages 89 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 79% faster.
- Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 350W).
Verdict: Arc Pro A60M or H100 PCIe 80GB?
Arc Pro A60M advantages
- Power efficiency (+73%)
H100 PCIe 80GB advantages
- 1440p gaming (+79%)
- 4K gaming (+80%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+88%)
- Video memory (+90%)
- Memory bandwidth (+89%)
- AI image generation (+96%)
- Local LLM inference (+92%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the H100 PCIe 80GB if you game at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M vs H100 PCIe 80GB: which should you choose?
Arc Pro A60M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
H100 PCIe 80GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Hopper) with 80 GB of HBM2e, averaging 89 fps at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M vs H100 PCIe 80GB: H100 PCIe 80GB is faster for gaming. H100 PCIe 80GB averages 89 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 79% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 350W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the H100 PCIe 80GB averages 89 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 50 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 80GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the H100 PCIe 80GB is quicker for AI image generation (20.5 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (143 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 95 W versus 350 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro A60M better than the H100 PCIe 80GB?
H100 PCIe 80GB is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. H100 PCIe 80GB averages 89 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 79% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc Pro A60M and the H100 PCIe 80GB?
H100 PCIe 80GB averages 89 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 79% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 350W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the H100 PCIe 80GB if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.