Graphics Card Comparison

Arc Pro A60M vs GTX 780

Verdict
Arc Pro A60M vs GTX 780: Arc Pro A60M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc Pro A60MGTX 780Difference
3DMark Time Spy2,2341,452+53.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3429+17.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1916+18.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K108+25.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.34.2+28.2%
VRAM8 GB GDDR63 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224336-33.3%
TDP (W)95250
  • Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 19% faster.
  • Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 250W).

Verdict: Arc Pro A60M or GTX 780?

Our recommendation
Arc Pro A60M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc Pro A60M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+16%)
  • 4K gaming (+20%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+35%)
  • Video memory (+63%)
  • Power efficiency (+62%)

GTX 780 advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+33%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 780 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Arc Pro A60M vs GTX 780: which should you choose?

Arc Pro A60M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

GTX 780 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p; launched at $649.

Arc Pro A60M vs GTX 780: Arc Pro A60M is faster for gaming. Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 19% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps against 16. At 4K (10 vs 8 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 95 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc Pro A60M better than the GTX 780?

Arc Pro A60M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 19% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc Pro A60M and the GTX 780?

Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 19% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 780 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc Pro A60M profile → GTX 780 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons