Graphics Card Comparison

Arc Pro A60M vs Arc A570M

Verdict
Arc Pro A60M vs Arc A570M: Arc Pro A60M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc Pro A60MArc A570MDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,2342,234
Avg FPS @ 1080p3434
Avg FPS @ 1440p1919
Avg FPS @ 4K1010
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.35.3
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224224
TDP (W)9575
Stable Diffusion (it/s)0.80.8
LLM inference (tokens/s)1111
  • Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 0% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 95W).

Verdict: Arc Pro A60M or Arc A570M?

Our recommendation
Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc Pro A60M advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

Arc A570M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+21%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Arc Pro A60M vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?

Arc Pro A60M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

Arc Pro A60M vs Arc A570M: Arc Pro A60M is faster for gaming. Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 0% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 95W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the Arc Pro A60M is quicker for AI image generation (0.8 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (11 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 95 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc Pro A60M better than the Arc A570M?

Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 0% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc Pro A60M and the Arc A570M?

Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 0% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 95W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc Pro A60M profile → Arc A570M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons