Arc B750 vs RX Vega 64
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B750 | RX Vega 64 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 4,431 | +63.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 49 | +38.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 29 | +41.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 16 | +43.8% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 12.7 | +35.9% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB HBM2 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 410 | +9.3% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 295 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $349 | $499 | -30.1% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 29 fps — about 41% faster.
- Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 295W).
Verdict: Arc B750 or RX Vega 64?
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+29%)
- 4K gaming (+30%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+39%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+8%)
- Power efficiency (+24%)
- Affordability (+30%)
RX Vega 64 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Arc B750 vs RX Vega 64: which should you choose?
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RX Vega 64 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 29 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.
Arc B750 vs RX Vega 64: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 29 fps — about 41% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 295W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 29. At 4K (23 vs 16 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 295 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $349 vs $499, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B750 better than the RX Vega 64?
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 29 fps — about 41% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the RX Vega 64?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 29 fps — about 41% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 295W).
Which is better value?
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.