Graphics Card Comparison

Arc B750 vs RX M 6500 XT

Verdict
Arc B750 vs RX M 6500 XT: Arc B750 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc B750RX M 6500 XTDifference
3DMark Time Spy7,2242,058+251.0%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6833+106.1%
Avg FPS @ 1440p4118+127.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K2310+130.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)17.24.9+251.0%
VRAM16 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448112+300.0%
TDP (W)22569
  • Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 128% faster.
  • RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 225W).

Verdict: Arc B750 or RX M 6500 XT?

Our recommendation
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc B750 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+56%)
  • 4K gaming (+57%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+72%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+75%)

RX M 6500 XT advantages

  • Power efficiency (+69%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Arc B750 vs RX M 6500 XT: which should you choose?

Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

RX M 6500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.

Arc B750 vs RX M 6500 XT: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 128% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 225W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 18. At 4K (23 vs 10 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 225 W versus 69 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc B750 better than the RX M 6500 XT?

Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 128% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the RX M 6500 XT?

Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 128% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 225W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc B750 profile → RX M 6500 XT profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons