Arc B750 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B750 | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 8,824 | -18.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 78 | -12.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 48 | -14.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 27 | -14.8% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 22.1 | -22.0% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 224 | +100.0% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 165 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 8.8 | -70.5% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 17 | +105.9% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $349 | $499 | -30.1% |
- RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 15% faster.
- RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws less power (165W vs 225W).
Verdict: Arc B750 or RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
Arc B750 advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- Local LLM inference (+51%)
- Affordability (+30%)
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB advantages
- 1440p gaming (+15%)
- 4K gaming (+15%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+18%)
- AI image generation (+70%)
- Power efficiency (+27%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B750 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you run local LLMs and AI inference.
Value for money
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Arc B750 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: which should you choose?
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 48 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.
Arc B750 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is faster for gaming. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 15% faster. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws less power (165W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps against 41. At 4K (23 vs 27 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is quicker for AI image generation (8.8 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 17 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 165 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $349 vs $499, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B750 better than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB takes the overall edge, though Arc B750 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 15% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 15% faster. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws less power (165W vs 225W).
Which is better value?
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B750 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.