Graphics Card Comparison

Arc B750 vs RTX 3090 Max-Q

Verdict
Arc B750 vs RTX 3090 Max-Q: RTX 3090 Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc B750RTX 3090 Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy7,22410,707-32.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6891-25.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p4156-26.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K2331-25.8%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)17.224.9-30.9%
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6X
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)4481,008-55.6%
TDP (W)225157
Stable Diffusion (it/s)2.610.0-74.0%
LLM inference (tokens/s)3580-56.3%
  • RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 27% faster.
  • RTX 3090 Max-Q draws less power (157W vs 225W).

Verdict: Arc B750 or RTX 3090 Max-Q?

Our recommendation
RTX 3090 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc B750 advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

RTX 3090 Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+27%)
  • 4K gaming (+26%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+33%)
  • Video memory (+33%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+56%)
  • AI image generation (+74%)
  • Local LLM inference (+56%)
  • Power efficiency (+30%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RTX 3090 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

Arc B750 vs RTX 3090 Max-Q: which should you choose?

Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

RTX 3090 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2020, Ampere) with 24 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 56 fps at 1440p.

Arc B750 vs RTX 3090 Max-Q: RTX 3090 Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 27% faster. RTX 3090 Max-Q draws less power (157W vs 225W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps against 41. At 4K (23 vs 31 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the RTX 3090 Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (10.0 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (80 vs 35 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 225 W versus 157 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc B750 better than the RTX 3090 Max-Q?

RTX 3090 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 27% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the RTX 3090 Max-Q?

RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 27% faster. RTX 3090 Max-Q draws less power (157W vs 225W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RTX 3090 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc B750 profile → RTX 3090 Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons