Arc B750 vs RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B750 | RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 10,259 | -29.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 88 | -22.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 54 | -24.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 30 | -23.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 23.9 | -27.9% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB GDDR6X | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 1,008 | -55.6% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 157 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 9.5 | -72.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 80 | -56.3% |
- RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q averages 54 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 24% faster.
- RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q draws less power (157W vs 225W).
Verdict: Arc B750 or RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q?
Arc B750 advantages
- Video memory (+25%)
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+24%)
- 4K gaming (+23%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+30%)
- Memory bandwidth (+56%)
- AI image generation (+73%)
- Local LLM inference (+56%)
- Power efficiency (+30%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B750 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Arc B750 vs RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2021, Ampere) with 12 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 54 fps at 1440p.
Arc B750 vs RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q: RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q averages 54 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 24% faster. RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q draws less power (157W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q averages 54 fps against 41. At 4K (23 vs 30 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (9.5 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (80 vs 35 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 157 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B750 better than the RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q?
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q averages 54 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 24% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q?
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q averages 54 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 24% faster. RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q draws less power (157W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B750 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.