Arc B750 vs RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B750 | RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 3,293 | +119.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 41 | +65.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 24 | +70.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 13 | +76.9% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 9.4 | +82.8% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 11 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 616 | -27.3% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 112 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 3.8 | -31.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 30 | +16.7% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 24 fps — about 71% faster.
- RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q draws less power (112W vs 225W).
Verdict: Arc B750 or RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q?
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+41%)
- 4K gaming (+43%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+54%)
- Video memory (+31%)
- Local LLM inference (+14%)
RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+27%)
- AI image generation (+32%)
- Power efficiency (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc B750 vs RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 11 GB of GDDR6, averaging 24 fps at 1440p.
Arc B750 vs RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 24 fps — about 71% faster. RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q draws less power (112W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 24. At 4K (23 vs 13 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 11GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (3.8 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 30 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 112 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B750 better than the RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q?
Arc B750 takes the overall edge, though RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 24 fps — about 71% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 24 fps — about 71% faster. RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q draws less power (112W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RTX 2080 Ti Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.