Arc B750 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B750 | NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 3,997 | +80.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 46 | +47.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 27 | +51.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 14 | +64.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 11.4 | +50.6% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 672 | -33.3% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 126 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 4.6 | -43.5% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 53 | -34.0% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 52% faster.
- NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q draws less power (126W vs 225W).
Verdict: Arc B750 or NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+34%)
- 4K gaming (+39%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+45%)
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q advantages
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
- AI image generation (+43%)
- Local LLM inference (+34%)
- Power efficiency (+44%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc B750 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.
Arc B750 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 52% faster. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q draws less power (126W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 27. At 4K (23 vs 14 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (4.6 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (53 vs 35 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 126 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B750 better than the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 52% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 52% faster. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q draws less power (126W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.