Graphics Card Comparison

Arc B750 vs Mali-G78 MP14

Verdict
Arc B750 vs Mali-G78 MP14: Arc B750 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc B750Mali-G78 MP14Difference
3DMark Time Spy7,224750+863.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6810+580.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p415+720.0%
VRAM16 GB GDDR60 MB Shared
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)44851+775.0%
TDP (W)2258
LLM inference (tokens/s)352+2,233.3%
  • Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 720% faster.
  • Mali-G78 MP14 draws less power (8W vs 225W).

Verdict: Arc B750 or Mali-G78 MP14?

Our recommendation
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc B750 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+88%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
  • Video memory (+100%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+89%)
  • Local LLM inference (+96%)

Mali-G78 MP14 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+96%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Mali-G78 MP14 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Arc B750 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.

Arc B750 vs Mali-G78 MP14: which should you choose?

Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

Mali-G78 MP14 — ARM integrated graphics processor (2020, Valhall 1st Gen) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 5 fps at 1440p.

Arc B750 vs Mali-G78 MP14: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 720% faster. Mali-G78 MP14 draws less power (8W vs 225W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 5. At 4K (23 vs fps) VRAM (16GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 225 W versus 8 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc B750 better than the Mali-G78 MP14?

Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 720% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the Mali-G78 MP14?

Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 720% faster. Mali-G78 MP14 draws less power (8W vs 225W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Mali-G78 MP14 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc B750 profile → Mali-G78 MP14 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons