Arc B750 vs Immortalis-G925 MC16
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B750 | Immortalis-G925 MC16 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 2,100 | +244.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 28 | +142.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 14 | +192.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 5 | +360.0% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 171 | +162.6% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 10 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 0.6 | +333.3% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 10 | +250.0% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 193% faster.
- Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 225W).
Verdict: Arc B750 or Immortalis-G925 MC16?
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+66%)
- 4K gaming (+78%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+71%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+62%)
- AI image generation (+77%)
- Local LLM inference (+71%)
Immortalis-G925 MC16 advantages
- Power efficiency (+96%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc B750 vs Immortalis-G925 MC16: which should you choose?
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
Immortalis-G925 MC16 — ARM integrated graphics processor (2024, 5th Gen) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
Arc B750 vs Immortalis-G925 MC16: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 193% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 14. At 4K (23 vs 5 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc B750 is quicker for AI image generation (2.6 vs 0.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 10 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 10 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B750 better than the Immortalis-G925 MC16?
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 193% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the Immortalis-G925 MC16?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 193% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.