Graphics Card Comparison

Arc B750 vs GTX 690

Verdict
Arc B750 vs GTX 690: Arc B750 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc B750GTX 690Difference
3DMark Time Spy7,2242,191+229.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6834+100.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p4119+115.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K2310+130.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)17.26.3+174.8%
VRAM16 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448448
TDP (W)225300
Launch MSRP (USD)$349$999-65.1%
  • Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 116% faster.
  • Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 300W).

Verdict: Arc B750 or GTX 690?

Our recommendation
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc B750 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+54%)
  • 4K gaming (+57%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+70%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Power efficiency (+25%)
  • Affordability (+65%)

GTX 690 advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Value for money

Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Arc B750 vs GTX 690: which should you choose?

Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

GTX 690 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.

Arc B750 vs GTX 690: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 116% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 300W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 19. At 4K (23 vs 10 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 225 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $349 vs $999, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc B750 better than the GTX 690?

Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 116% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc B750 and the GTX 690?

Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 116% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 300W).

Which is better value?

Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc B750 profile → GTX 690 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons