Arc B580 vs Quadro K2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B580 | Quadro K2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 6,022 | 255 | +2,261.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 60 | 21 | +185.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 36 | 11 | +227.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 20 | 5 | +300.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 14.3 | 0.7 | +1,864.4% |
| VRAM | 12 GB GDDR6 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 336 | 112 | +200.0% |
| TDP (W) | 190 | 51 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $249 | $599 | -58.4% |
- Arc B580 averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 227% faster.
- Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 190W).
Verdict: Arc B580 or Quadro K2000?
Arc B580 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+69%)
- 4K gaming (+75%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+96%)
- Video memory (+83%)
- Memory bandwidth (+67%)
- Affordability (+58%)
Quadro K2000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+73%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B580 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro K2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc B580 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
Arc B580 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Arc B580 vs Quadro K2000: which should you choose?
Arc B580 — Intel desktop graphics card (2024, Battlemage) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p; launched at $249.
Quadro K2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $599.
Arc B580 vs Quadro K2000: Arc B580 is faster for gaming. Arc B580 averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 227% faster. Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 190W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B580 averages 36 fps against 11. At 4K (20 vs 5 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 190 W versus 51 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $249 vs $599, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B580 better than the Quadro K2000?
Arc B580 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B580 averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 227% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B580 and the Quadro K2000?
Arc B580 averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 227% faster. Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 190W).
Which is better value?
Arc B580 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B580 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro K2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.