Arc B570 vs RX M 6900 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc B570 | RX M 6900 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 9,800 | 8,223 | +19.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 98 | 74 | +32.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 68 | 45 | +51.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 30 | 25 | +20.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7 | 19.6 | -96.3% |
| VRAM | 10 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 380 | 448 | -15.2% |
| TDP (W) | 150 | 195 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 3.1 | 2.9 | +6.9% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 18 | 35 | -48.6% |
- Arc B570 averages 68 fps at 1440p versus 45 fps — about 51% faster.
- Arc B570 draws less power (150W vs 195W).
Verdict: Arc B570 or RX M 6900 XT?
Arc B570 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+34%)
- 4K gaming (+17%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+16%)
- AI image generation (+6%)
- Power efficiency (+23%)
RX M 6900 XT advantages
- Video memory (+38%)
- Memory bandwidth (+15%)
- Local LLM inference (+49%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc B570 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX M 6900 XT if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Arc B570 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc B570 vs RX M 6900 XT: which should you choose?
Arc B570 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Xe2-HPG) with 10 GB of GDDR6, averaging 68 fps at 1440p; launched at $219.
RX M 6900 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 45 fps at 1440p.
Arc B570 vs RX M 6900 XT: Arc B570 is faster for gaming. Arc B570 averages 68 fps at 1440p versus 45 fps — about 51% faster. Arc B570 draws less power (150W vs 195W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B570 averages 68 fps against 45. At 4K (30 vs 25 fps) VRAM (10GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc B570 is quicker for AI image generation (3.1 vs 2.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 18 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 150 W versus 195 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc B570 better than the RX M 6900 XT?
Arc B570 takes the overall edge, though RX M 6900 XT wins in specific areas worth weighing. Arc B570 averages 68 fps at 1440p versus 45 fps — about 51% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc B570 and the RX M 6900 XT?
Arc B570 averages 68 fps at 1440p versus 45 fps — about 51% faster. Arc B570 draws less power (150W vs 195W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc B570 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 6900 XT if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.