Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A770M vs Tesla M40

Verdict
Arc A770M vs Tesla M40: Arc A770M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A770MTesla M40Difference
3DMark Time Spy6,1402,394+156.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6035+71.4%
Avg FPS @ 1440p3620+80.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K2010+100.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)14.66.8+113.7%
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448288+55.6%
TDP (W)135250
  • Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 80% faster.
  • Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 250W).

Verdict: Arc A770M or Tesla M40?

Our recommendation
Arc A770M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A770M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+44%)
  • 4K gaming (+50%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+61%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+36%)
  • Power efficiency (+46%)

Tesla M40 advantages

  • Video memory (+33%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Tesla M40 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Arc A770M vs Tesla M40: which should you choose?

Arc A770M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p.

Tesla M40 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 24 GB of GDDR5, averaging 20 fps at 1440p.

Arc A770M vs Tesla M40: Arc A770M is faster for gaming. Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 80% faster. Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770M averages 36 fps against 20. At 4K (20 vs 10 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 135 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A770M better than the Tesla M40?

Arc A770M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 80% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A770M and the Tesla M40?

Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 80% faster. Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 1440p. Choose the Tesla M40 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A770M profile → Tesla M40 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons