Arc A770M vs RX M 6500 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A770M | RX M 6500 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 6,140 | 2,058 | +198.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 60 | 33 | +81.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 36 | 18 | +100.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 20 | 10 | +100.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 14.6 | 4.9 | +198.4% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 4 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 112 | +300.0% |
| TDP (W) | 135 | 69 | — |
- Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 100% faster.
- RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 135W).
Verdict: Arc A770M or RX M 6500 XT?
Arc A770M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+50%)
- 4K gaming (+50%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+66%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
RX M 6500 XT advantages
- Power efficiency (+49%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A770M vs RX M 6500 XT: which should you choose?
Arc A770M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p.
RX M 6500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.
Arc A770M vs RX M 6500 XT: Arc A770M is faster for gaming. Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 100% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 135W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770M averages 36 fps against 18. At 4K (20 vs 10 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 135 W versus 69 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A770M better than the RX M 6500 XT?
Arc A770M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 100% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A770M and the RX M 6500 XT?
Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 100% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 135W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.