Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A770M vs RTX 3090 Ti

Verdict
Arc A770M vs RTX 3090 Ti: RTX 3090 Ti is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A770MRTX 3090 TiDifference
3DMark Time Spy6,14016,000-61.6%
Avg FPS @ 1080p60126-52.4%
Avg FPS @ 1440p3679-54.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K2045-55.6%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)14.640.0-63.5%
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6X
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)4481,008-55.6%
TDP (W)135450
Stable Diffusion (it/s)2.216.0-86.3%
LLM inference (tokens/s)3580-56.3%
  • RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 54% faster.
  • Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 450W).

Verdict: Arc A770M or RTX 3090 Ti?

Our recommendation
RTX 3090 Ti is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A770M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+70%)

RTX 3090 Ti advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+54%)
  • 4K gaming (+56%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+62%)
  • Video memory (+33%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+56%)
  • AI image generation (+86%)
  • Local LLM inference (+56%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A770M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RTX 3090 Ti if you game at 1440p.

Arc A770M vs RTX 3090 Ti: which should you choose?

Arc A770M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p.

RTX 3090 Ti — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Ampere) with 24 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 79 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,999.

Arc A770M vs RTX 3090 Ti: RTX 3090 Ti is faster for gaming. RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 54% faster. Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 450W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps against 36. At 4K (20 vs 45 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the RTX 3090 Ti is quicker for AI image generation (16.0 vs 2.2 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (80 vs 35 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 135 W versus 450 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A770M better than the RTX 3090 Ti?

RTX 3090 Ti is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 54% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A770M and the RTX 3090 Ti?

RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 54% faster. Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 450W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A770M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 3090 Ti if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A770M profile → RTX 3090 Ti profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons