Arc A770 vs RTX 3090 Ti
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A770 | RTX 3090 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 16,000 | -54.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 126 | -46.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 79 | -48.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 45 | -48.9% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 40.0 | -57.0% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6X | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 1,008 | -55.6% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 450 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 16.0 | -83.8% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 80 | -56.3% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $349 | $1,999 | -82.5% |
- RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 48% faster.
- Arc A770 draws less power (225W vs 450W).
Verdict: Arc A770 or RTX 3090 Ti?
Arc A770 advantages
- Power efficiency (+50%)
- Affordability (+83%)
RTX 3090 Ti advantages
- 1440p gaming (+48%)
- 4K gaming (+49%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+55%)
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+56%)
- AI image generation (+84%)
- Local LLM inference (+56%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A770 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 3090 Ti if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc A770 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
Arc A770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Arc A770 vs RTX 3090 Ti: which should you choose?
Arc A770 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RTX 3090 Ti — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Ampere) with 24 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 79 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,999.
Arc A770 vs RTX 3090 Ti: RTX 3090 Ti is faster for gaming. RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 48% faster. Arc A770 draws less power (225W vs 450W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps against 41. At 4K (23 vs 45 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 3090 Ti is quicker for AI image generation (16.0 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (80 vs 35 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 450 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $349 vs $1,999, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A770 better than the RTX 3090 Ti?
RTX 3090 Ti takes the overall edge, though Arc A770 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 48% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A770 and the RTX 3090 Ti?
RTX 3090 Ti averages 79 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 48% faster. Arc A770 draws less power (225W vs 450W).
Which is better value?
Arc A770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A770 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 3090 Ti if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.