Arc A750M vs RX 6800
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A750M | RX 6800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,245 | 6,791 | -22.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 54 | 65 | -16.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 32 | 39 | -17.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 18 | 21 | -14.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 12.5 | 16.2 | -22.8% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 448 | — |
| TDP (W) | 135 | 250 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.9 | 2.4 | -20.8% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 35 | -37.1% |
- RX 6800 averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 18% faster.
- Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 250W).
Verdict: Arc A750M or RX 6800?
Arc A750M advantages
- Power efficiency (+46%)
RX 6800 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+18%)
- 4K gaming (+14%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+23%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- AI image generation (+21%)
- Local LLM inference (+37%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A750M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX 6800 if you game at 1440p.
Arc A750M vs RX 6800: which should you choose?
Arc A750M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.
RX 6800 — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 39 fps at 1440p; launched at $579.
Arc A750M vs RX 6800: RX 6800 is faster for gaming. RX 6800 averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 18% faster. Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 250W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6800 averages 39 fps against 32. At 4K (18 vs 21 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RX 6800 is quicker for AI image generation (2.4 vs 1.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 135 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A750M better than the RX 6800?
RX 6800 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 6800 averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 18% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A750M and the RX 6800?
RX 6800 averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 18% faster. Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 250W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A750M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX 6800 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.