Arc A750M vs RX 460
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A750M | RX 460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,245 | 752 | +597.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 54 | 25 | +116.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 32 | 13 | +146.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 18 | 6 | +200.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 12.5 | 2.2 | +480.9% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 112 | +300.0% |
| TDP (W) | 135 | 75 | — |
- Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 146% faster.
- RX 460 draws less power (75W vs 135W).
Verdict: Arc A750M or RX 460?
Arc A750M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+59%)
- 4K gaming (+67%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+86%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
RX 460 advantages
- Power efficiency (+44%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A750M vs RX 460: which should you choose?
Arc A750M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.
RX 460 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $109.
Arc A750M vs RX 460: Arc A750M is faster for gaming. Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 146% faster. RX 460 draws less power (75W vs 135W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A750M averages 32 fps against 13. At 4K (18 vs 6 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 135 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A750M better than the RX 460?
Arc A750M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 146% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A750M and the RX 460?
Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 146% faster. RX 460 draws less power (75W vs 135W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.