Arc A750M vs RTX 5080 Super Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A750M | RTX 5080 Super Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,245 | 15,747 | -66.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 54 | 124 | -56.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 32 | 78 | -59.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 18 | 44 | -59.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 12.5 | 39.4 | -68.3% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 896 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 135 | 186 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.9 | 15.7 | -87.9% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 71 | -69.0% |
- RTX 5080 Super Max-Q averages 78 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 59% faster.
- Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 186W).
Verdict: Arc A750M or RTX 5080 Super Max-Q?
Arc A750M advantages
- Power efficiency (+27%)
RTX 5080 Super Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+59%)
- 4K gaming (+59%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+67%)
- Video memory (+67%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- AI image generation (+88%)
- Local LLM inference (+69%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A750M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 5080 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Arc A750M vs RTX 5080 Super Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc A750M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.
RTX 5080 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2026, Blackwell) with 24 GB of GDDR7, averaging 78 fps at 1440p.
Arc A750M vs RTX 5080 Super Max-Q: RTX 5080 Super Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 5080 Super Max-Q averages 78 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 59% faster. Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 186W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5080 Super Max-Q averages 78 fps against 32. At 4K (18 vs 44 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 5080 Super Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (15.7 vs 1.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (71 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 135 W versus 186 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A750M better than the RTX 5080 Super Max-Q?
RTX 5080 Super Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5080 Super Max-Q averages 78 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 59% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A750M and the RTX 5080 Super Max-Q?
RTX 5080 Super Max-Q averages 78 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 59% faster. Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 186W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A750M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5080 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.