Arc A750M vs RTX 4070 Super Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A750M | RTX 4070 Super Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,245 | 9,932 | -47.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 54 | 86 | -37.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 32 | 53 | -39.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 18 | 29 | -37.9% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 12.5 | 24.8 | -49.7% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB GDDR6X | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 504 | -11.1% |
| TDP (W) | 135 | 99 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.9 | 9.9 | -80.8% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 40 | -45.0% |
- RTX 4070 Super Max-Q averages 53 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 40% faster.
- RTX 4070 Super Max-Q draws less power (99W vs 135W).
Verdict: Arc A750M or RTX 4070 Super Max-Q?
Arc A750M advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
RTX 4070 Super Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+40%)
- 4K gaming (+38%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+47%)
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+11%)
- AI image generation (+81%)
- Local LLM inference (+45%)
- Power efficiency (+27%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 4070 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Arc A750M vs RTX 4070 Super Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc A750M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.
RTX 4070 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2024, Ada Lovelace) with 12 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 53 fps at 1440p.
Arc A750M vs RTX 4070 Super Max-Q: RTX 4070 Super Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 4070 Super Max-Q averages 53 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 40% faster. RTX 4070 Super Max-Q draws less power (99W vs 135W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4070 Super Max-Q averages 53 fps against 32. At 4K (18 vs 29 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4070 Super Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (9.9 vs 1.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (40 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 135 W versus 99 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A750M better than the RTX 4070 Super Max-Q?
RTX 4070 Super Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4070 Super Max-Q averages 53 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 40% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A750M and the RTX 4070 Super Max-Q?
RTX 4070 Super Max-Q averages 53 fps at 1440p versus 32 fps — about 40% faster. RTX 4070 Super Max-Q draws less power (99W vs 135W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 4070 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.