Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A750M vs GTX 980 Ti

Verdict
Arc A750M vs GTX 980 Ti: Arc A750M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A750MGTX 980 TiDifference
3DMark Time Spy5,2452,121+147.3%
Avg FPS @ 1080p5434+58.8%
Avg FPS @ 1440p3219+68.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K1810+80.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)12.56.1+106.1%
VRAM8 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448336+33.3%
TDP (W)135250
  • Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 68% faster.
  • Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 250W).

Verdict: Arc A750M or GTX 980 Ti?

Our recommendation
Arc A750M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A750M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+41%)
  • 4K gaming (+44%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+60%)
  • Video memory (+25%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+25%)
  • Power efficiency (+46%)

GTX 980 Ti advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Arc A750M vs GTX 980 Ti: which should you choose?

Arc A750M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.

GTX 980 Ti — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p; launched at $649.

Arc A750M vs GTX 980 Ti: Arc A750M is faster for gaming. Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 68% faster. Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A750M averages 32 fps against 19. At 4K (18 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 6GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 135 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A750M better than the GTX 980 Ti?

Arc A750M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 68% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A750M and the GTX 980 Ti?

Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 68% faster. Arc A750M draws less power (135W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A750M profile → GTX 980 Ti profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons