Arc A580M vs Adreno X1-85
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A580M | Adreno X1-85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,729 | 3,100 | +20.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 44 | 48 | -8.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 26 | 26 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 14 | 10 | +40.0% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 136 | +229.4% |
| TDP (W) | 111 | 15 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.3 | 1.2 | +8.3% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 18 | +22.2% |
- Arc A580M averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 0% faster.
- Adreno X1-85 draws less power (15W vs 111W).
Verdict: Arc A580M or Adreno X1-85?
Arc A580M advantages
- 4K gaming (+29%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+17%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+70%)
- AI image generation (+8%)
- Local LLM inference (+18%)
Adreno X1-85 advantages
- Power efficiency (+86%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A580M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
- Choose the Adreno X1-85 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A580M if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
Arc A580M vs Adreno X1-85: which should you choose?
Arc A580M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 26 fps at 1440p.
Adreno X1-85 — Qualcomm integrated graphics processor (2024, Adreno 700) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 26 fps at 1440p.
Arc A580M vs Adreno X1-85: Arc A580M is faster for gaming. Arc A580M averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 0% faster. Adreno X1-85 draws less power (15W vs 111W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A580M averages 26 fps against 26. At 4K (14 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc A580M is quicker for AI image generation (1.3 vs 1.2 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (22 vs 18 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 111 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A580M better than the Adreno X1-85?
Arc A580M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A580M averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 0% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A580M and the Adreno X1-85?
Arc A580M averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 0% faster. Adreno X1-85 draws less power (15W vs 111W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A580M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display. Choose the Adreno X1-85 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.