Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A570M vs RX M 7900 XT

Verdict
Arc A570M vs RX M 7900 XT: RX M 7900 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A570MRX M 7900 XTDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,2349,210-75.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3481-58.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1950-62.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K1028-64.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.321.9-75.7%
VRAM8 GB GDDR620 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224560-60.0%
TDP (W)75204
Stable Diffusion (it/s)0.83.3-75.8%
LLM inference (tokens/s)1144-75.0%
  • RX M 7900 XT averages 50 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 62% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 204W).

Verdict: Arc A570M or RX M 7900 XT?

Our recommendation
RX M 7900 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A570M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+63%)

RX M 7900 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+62%)
  • 4K gaming (+64%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+76%)
  • Video memory (+60%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+60%)
  • AI image generation (+76%)
  • Local LLM inference (+75%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 7900 XT if you game at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs RX M 7900 XT: which should you choose?

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

RX M 7900 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 3) with 20 GB of GDDR6, averaging 50 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs RX M 7900 XT: RX M 7900 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 7900 XT averages 50 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 62% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 204W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7900 XT averages 50 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 28 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 20GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the RX M 7900 XT is quicker for AI image generation (3.3 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (44 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 204 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A570M better than the RX M 7900 XT?

RX M 7900 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 7900 XT averages 50 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 62% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the RX M 7900 XT?

RX M 7900 XT averages 50 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 62% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 204W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 7900 XT if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A570M profile → RX M 7900 XT profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons