Arc A570M vs RX M 7700 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A570M | RX M 7700 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 6,274 | -64.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 61 | -44.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 37 | -48.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 20 | -50.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.3 | 14.9 | -64.4% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 336 | -33.3% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 159 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.8 | 2.2 | -63.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 26 | -57.7% |
- RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 49% faster.
- Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 159W).
Verdict: Arc A570M or RX M 7700 XT?
Arc A570M advantages
- Power efficiency (+53%)
RX M 7700 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+49%)
- 4K gaming (+50%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+64%)
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
- AI image generation (+64%)
- Local LLM inference (+58%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.
Arc A570M vs RX M 7700 XT: which should you choose?
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
RX M 7700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 37 fps at 1440p.
Arc A570M vs RX M 7700 XT: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 49% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 159W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 20 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RX M 7700 XT is quicker for AI image generation (2.2 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (26 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 159 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A570M better than the RX M 7700 XT?
RX M 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 49% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the RX M 7700 XT?
RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 49% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 159W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.