Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A570M vs RX M 6600

Verdict
Arc A570M vs RX M 6600: RX M 6600 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A570MRX M 6600Difference
3DMark Time Spy2,2343,187-29.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3441-17.1%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1923-17.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K1012-16.7%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.37.6-29.9%
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224224
TDP (W)7585
Stable Diffusion (it/s)0.81.1-27.3%
LLM inference (tokens/s)1111
  • RX M 6600 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 85W).

Verdict: Arc A570M or RX M 6600?

Our recommendation
RX M 6600 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A570M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+12%)

RX M 6600 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+17%)
  • 4K gaming (+17%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+30%)
  • AI image generation (+27%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 6600 if you game at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs RX M 6600: which should you choose?

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

RX M 6600 — AMD desktop graphics card (2021, RDNA 2) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 23 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs RX M 6600: RX M 6600 is faster for gaming. RX M 6600 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 85W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6600 averages 23 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 12 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the RX M 6600 is quicker for AI image generation (1.1 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (11 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 85 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A570M better than the RX M 6600?

RX M 6600 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 6600 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the RX M 6600?

RX M 6600 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 85W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 6600 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A570M profile → RX M 6600 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons