Arc A570M vs Quadro K2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A570M | Quadro K2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 255 | +776.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 21 | +61.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 11 | +72.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 5 | +100.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.3 | 0.7 | +628.8% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 112 | +100.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 51 | — |
- Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 73% faster.
- Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 75W).
Verdict: Arc A570M or Quadro K2000?
Arc A570M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+42%)
- 4K gaming (+50%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+89%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Quadro K2000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+32%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro K2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A570M vs Quadro K2000: which should you choose?
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
Quadro K2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $599.
Arc A570M vs Quadro K2000: Arc A570M is faster for gaming. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 73% faster. Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A570M averages 19 fps against 11. At 4K (10 vs 5 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 51 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A570M better than the Quadro K2000?
Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 73% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the Quadro K2000?
Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 73% faster. Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro K2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.