Arc A570M vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A570M | NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 3,997 | -44.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 46 | -26.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 27 | -29.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 14 | -28.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.3 | 11.4 | -53.4% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 672 | -66.7% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 126 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.8 | 4.6 | -82.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 53 | -79.2% |
- NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 30% faster.
- Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 126W).
Verdict: Arc A570M or NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?
Arc A570M advantages
- Power efficiency (+40%)
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+30%)
- 4K gaming (+29%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+44%)
- Video memory (+67%)
- Memory bandwidth (+67%)
- AI image generation (+83%)
- Local LLM inference (+79%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Arc A570M vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.
Arc A570M vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 30% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 126W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 14 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (4.6 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (53 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 126 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A570M better than the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 30% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 30% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 126W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.