Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A570M vs Mali-G78 MP14

Verdict
Arc A570M vs Mali-G78 MP14: Arc A570M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A570MMali-G78 MP14Difference
3DMark Time Spy2,234750+197.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3410+240.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p195+280.0%
VRAM8 GB GDDR60 MB Shared
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)22451+337.5%
TDP (W)758
LLM inference (tokens/s)112+633.3%
  • Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 280% faster.
  • Mali-G78 MP14 draws less power (8W vs 75W).

Verdict: Arc A570M or Mali-G78 MP14?

Our recommendation
Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A570M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+74%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+66%)
  • Video memory (+100%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+77%)
  • Local LLM inference (+86%)

Mali-G78 MP14 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+89%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Mali-G78 MP14 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.

Arc A570M vs Mali-G78 MP14: which should you choose?

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

Mali-G78 MP14 — ARM integrated graphics processor (2020, Valhall 1st Gen) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 5 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs Mali-G78 MP14: Arc A570M is faster for gaming. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 280% faster. Mali-G78 MP14 draws less power (8W vs 75W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A570M averages 19 fps against 5. At 4K (10 vs fps) VRAM (8GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 8 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A570M better than the Mali-G78 MP14?

Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 280% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the Mali-G78 MP14?

Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 5 fps — about 280% faster. Mali-G78 MP14 draws less power (8W vs 75W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p. Choose the Mali-G78 MP14 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A570M profile → Mali-G78 MP14 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons