Arc A570M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A570M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,234 | 1,650 | +35.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 25 | +36.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 12 | +58.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 5 | +100.0% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 68 | +228.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 15 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.8 | 0.1 | +700.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 2 | +450.0% |
- Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 58% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 75W).
Verdict: Arc A570M or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Arc A570M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+37%)
- 4K gaming (+50%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+26%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+70%)
- AI image generation (+88%)
- Local LLM inference (+82%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Power efficiency (+80%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A570M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: which should you choose?
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
Arc A570M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: Arc A570M is faster for gaming. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 58% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A570M averages 19 fps against 12. At 4K (10 vs 5 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc A570M is quicker for AI image generation (0.8 vs 0.1 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (11 vs 2 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A570M better than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 58% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 58% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p. Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.