Arc A380M vs RX 480
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A380M | RX 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,461 | 2,040 | -28.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 29 | 33 | -12.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 16 | 18 | -11.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 10 | -20.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.5 | 5.8 | -40.3% |
| VRAM | 6 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 168 | 224 | -25.0% |
| TDP (W) | 45 | 150 | — |
- RX 480 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 11% faster.
- Arc A380M draws less power (45W vs 150W).
Verdict: Arc A380M or RX 480?
Arc A380M advantages
- Power efficiency (+70%)
RX 480 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+11%)
- 4K gaming (+20%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+28%)
- Video memory (+25%)
- Memory bandwidth (+25%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A380M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX 480 if you game at 1440p.
Arc A380M vs RX 480: which should you choose?
Arc A380M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.
RX 480 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $239.
Arc A380M vs RX 480: RX 480 is faster for gaming. RX 480 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 11% faster. Arc A380M draws less power (45W vs 150W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 480 averages 18 fps against 16. At 4K (8 vs 10 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 45 W versus 150 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A380M better than the RX 480?
RX 480 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 480 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 11% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A380M and the RX 480?
RX 480 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 11% faster. Arc A380M draws less power (45W vs 150W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A380M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX 480 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.