Arc A380M vs Quadro M2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A380M | Quadro M2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,461 | 626 | +133.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 29 | 24 | +20.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 16 | 12 | +33.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 6 | +33.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.5 | 1.8 | +94.4% |
| VRAM | 6 GB GDDR6 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 168 | 112 | +50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 45 | 75 | — |
- Arc A380M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster.
- Arc A380M draws less power (45W vs 75W).
Verdict: Arc A380M or Quadro M2000?
Arc A380M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+25%)
- 4K gaming (+25%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+57%)
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
- Power efficiency (+40%)
Quadro M2000 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A380M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc A380M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A380M vs Quadro M2000: which should you choose?
Arc A380M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
Arc A380M vs Quadro M2000: Arc A380M is faster for gaming. Arc A380M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster. Arc A380M draws less power (45W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A380M averages 16 fps against 12. At 4K (8 vs 6 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 45 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A380M better than the Quadro M2000?
Arc A380M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A380M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A380M and the Quadro M2000?
Arc A380M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster. Arc A380M draws less power (45W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A380M if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A380M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.