Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A380 vs RX 580

Verdict
Arc A380 vs RX 580: RX 580 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A380RX 580Difference
3DMark Time Spy1,7212,159-20.3%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3134-8.8%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1719-10.5%
Avg FPS @ 4K910-10.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.16.2-33.5%
VRAM6 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168224-25.0%
TDP (W)75185
Launch MSRP (USD)$139$229-39.3%
  • RX 580 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster.
  • Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 185W).

Verdict: Arc A380 or RX 580?

Our recommendation
RX 580 takes the overall edge, though Arc A380 wins in specific areas worth weighing.

Arc A380 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+59%)
  • Affordability (+39%)

RX 580 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+11%)
  • 4K gaming (+10%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+20%)
  • Video memory (+25%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+25%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A380 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX 580 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc A380 if you want the better price for the performance.

Value for money

Arc A380 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Arc A380 vs RX 580: which should you choose?

Arc A380 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.

RX 580 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p; launched at $229.

Arc A380 vs RX 580: RX 580 is faster for gaming. RX 580 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 185W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 580 averages 19 fps against 17. At 4K (9 vs 10 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 185 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $139 vs $229, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A380 better than the RX 580?

RX 580 takes the overall edge, though Arc A380 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX 580 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A380 and the RX 580?

RX 580 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 185W).

Which is better value?

Arc A380 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A380 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX 580 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A380 profile → RX 580 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons