Arc A380 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A380 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,721 | 1,650 | +4.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 31 | 25 | +24.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 17 | 12 | +41.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 9 | 5 | +80.0% |
| VRAM | 6 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 168 | 68 | +146.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 15 | — |
- Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 75W).
Verdict: Arc A380 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Arc A380 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+29%)
- 4K gaming (+44%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+4%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+59%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Power efficiency (+80%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A380 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A380 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A380 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: which should you choose?
Arc A380 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
Arc A380 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: Arc A380 is faster for gaming. Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A380 averages 17 fps against 12. At 4K (9 vs 5 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A380 better than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Arc A380 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A380 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A380 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.