Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A380 vs GTX 760 Max-Q

Verdict
Arc A380 vs GTX 760 Max-Q: Arc A380 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A380GTX 760 Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,721584+194.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3123+34.8%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1712+41.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K96+50.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.11.7+145.5%
VRAM6 GB GDDR62 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168224-25.0%
TDP (W)7576
  • Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster.
  • Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 76W).

Verdict: Arc A380 or GTX 760 Max-Q?

Our recommendation
Arc A380 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A380 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+29%)
  • 4K gaming (+33%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+66%)
  • Video memory (+67%)

GTX 760 Max-Q advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+25%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A380 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 760 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the Arc A380 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Arc A380 vs GTX 760 Max-Q: which should you choose?

Arc A380 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.

GTX 760 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.

Arc A380 vs GTX 760 Max-Q: Arc A380 is faster for gaming. Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 76W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A380 averages 17 fps against 12. At 4K (9 vs 6 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 76 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A380 better than the GTX 760 Max-Q?

Arc A380 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A380 and the GTX 760 Max-Q?

Arc A380 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 42% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 76W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A380 if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 760 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A380 profile → GTX 760 Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons