Arc A310 vs Pro WX 7100
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A310 | Pro WX 7100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,289 | 2,005 | -35.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 33 | -15.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 18 | -16.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 10 | -20.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.1 | 5.7 | -46.4% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 224 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 130 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $110 | $799 | -86.2% |
- Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 17% faster.
- Arc A310 draws less power (75W vs 130W).
Verdict: Arc A310 or Pro WX 7100?
Arc A310 advantages
- Power efficiency (+42%)
- Affordability (+86%)
Pro WX 7100 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+17%)
- 4K gaming (+20%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+36%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A310 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc A310 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
Arc A310 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Arc A310 vs Pro WX 7100: which should you choose?
Arc A310 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $110.
Pro WX 7100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $799.
Arc A310 vs Pro WX 7100: Pro WX 7100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 17% faster. Arc A310 draws less power (75W vs 130W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps against 15. At 4K (8 vs 10 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 130 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $110 vs $799, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A310 better than the Pro WX 7100?
Pro WX 7100 takes the overall edge, though Arc A310 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 17% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A310 and the Pro WX 7100?
Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 17% faster. Arc A310 draws less power (75W vs 130W).
Which is better value?
Arc A310 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A310 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.