Arc A310 vs Immortalis-G925 MC16
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A310 | Immortalis-G925 MC16 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,289 | 2,100 | -38.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 28 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 14 | +7.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 5 | +60.0% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 171 | -34.3% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 10 | — |
- Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster.
- Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 75W).
Verdict: Arc A310 or Immortalis-G925 MC16?
Arc A310 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+7%)
- 4K gaming (+38%)
- Video memory (+100%)
Immortalis-G925 MC16 advantages
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+39%)
- Memory bandwidth (+34%)
- Power efficiency (+87%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
- Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A310 vs Immortalis-G925 MC16: which should you choose?
Arc A310 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $110.
Immortalis-G925 MC16 — ARM integrated graphics processor (2024, 5th Gen) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
Arc A310 vs Immortalis-G925 MC16: Arc A310 is faster for gaming. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A310 averages 15 fps against 14. At 4K (8 vs 5 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 10 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A310 better than the Immortalis-G925 MC16?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A310 and the Immortalis-G925 MC16?
Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.