Arc A310 vs GTX 650 Ti Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A310 | GTX 650 Ti Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,289 | 350 | +268.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 22 | +27.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 11 | +36.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 5 | +60.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.1 | 1.0 | +207.0% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 1 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 112 | — |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 49 | — |
- Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster.
- GTX 650 Ti Max-Q draws less power (49W vs 75W).
Verdict: Arc A310 or GTX 650 Ti Max-Q?
Arc A310 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+27%)
- 4K gaming (+38%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+73%)
- Video memory (+75%)
GTX 650 Ti Max-Q advantages
- Power efficiency (+35%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GTX 650 Ti Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A310 vs GTX 650 Ti Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc A310 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $110.
GTX 650 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.
Arc A310 vs GTX 650 Ti Max-Q: Arc A310 is faster for gaming. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster. GTX 650 Ti Max-Q draws less power (49W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A310 averages 15 fps against 11. At 4K (8 vs 5 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 1GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 49 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A310 better than the GTX 650 Ti Max-Q?
Arc A310 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A310 and the GTX 650 Ti Max-Q?
Arc A310 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster. GTX 650 Ti Max-Q draws less power (49W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A310 if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 650 Ti Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.