Adreno 830 vs Arc A750M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Adreno 830 | Arc A750M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,400 | 5,245 | -54.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 35 | 54 | -35.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 18 | 32 | -43.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 18 | -72.2% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 85 | 448 | -81.1% |
| TDP (W) | 10 | 135 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.8 | 1.9 | -57.9% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 13 | 22 | -40.9% |
- Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster.
- Adreno 830 draws less power (10W vs 135W).
Verdict: Adreno 830 or Arc A750M?
Adreno 830 advantages
- Power efficiency (+93%)
Arc A750M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+44%)
- 4K gaming (+72%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+54%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+81%)
- AI image generation (+58%)
- Local LLM inference (+41%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Adreno 830 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 1440p.
Adreno 830 vs Arc A750M: which should you choose?
Adreno 830 — Qualcomm integrated graphics processor (2024, Adreno 800) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.
Arc A750M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.
Adreno 830 vs Arc A750M: Arc A750M is faster for gaming. Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster. Adreno 830 draws less power (10W vs 135W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A750M averages 32 fps against 18. At 4K (5 vs 18 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc A750M is quicker for AI image generation (1.9 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (22 vs 13 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 10 W versus 135 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Adreno 830 better than the Arc A750M?
Arc A750M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster.
What is the main difference between the Adreno 830 and the Arc A750M?
Arc A750M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster. Adreno 830 draws less power (10W vs 135W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Adreno 830 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc A750M if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.