Graphics Card Comparison

A100 PCIe 40GB vs Arc Pro A40M

Verdict
A100 PCIe 40GB vs Arc Pro A40M: A100 PCIe 40GB is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricA100 PCIe 40GBArc Pro A40MDifference
3DMark Time Spy6,8211,117+510.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6527+140.7%
Avg FPS @ 1440p3914+178.6%
Avg FPS @ 4K217+200.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)19.52.7+632.7%
VRAM40 GB HBM26 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)1,555168+825.6%
TDP (W)25050
  • A100 PCIe 40GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 179% faster.
  • Arc Pro A40M draws less power (50W vs 250W).

Verdict: A100 PCIe 40GB or Arc Pro A40M?

Our recommendation
A100 PCIe 40GB is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

A100 PCIe 40GB advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+64%)
  • 4K gaming (+67%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+84%)
  • Video memory (+85%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+89%)

Arc Pro A40M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+80%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the A100 PCIe 40GB if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc Pro A40M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the A100 PCIe 40GB if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

A100 PCIe 40GB vs Arc Pro A40M: which should you choose?

A100 PCIe 40GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2020, Ampere) with 40 GB of HBM2, averaging 39 fps at 1440p.

Arc Pro A40M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

A100 PCIe 40GB vs Arc Pro A40M: A100 PCIe 40GB is faster for gaming. A100 PCIe 40GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 179% faster. Arc Pro A40M draws less power (50W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the A100 PCIe 40GB averages 39 fps against 14. At 4K (21 vs 7 fps) VRAM (40GB vs 6GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 250 W versus 50 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the A100 PCIe 40GB better than the Arc Pro A40M?

A100 PCIe 40GB is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. A100 PCIe 40GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 179% faster.

What is the main difference between the A100 PCIe 40GB and the Arc Pro A40M?

A100 PCIe 40GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 179% faster. Arc Pro A40M draws less power (50W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the A100 PCIe 40GB if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc Pro A40M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
A100 PCIe 40GB profile → Arc Pro A40M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons