Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Core i9 14900KS
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i9 14900KS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 77 | 144 | -46.5% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,921 | 2,443 | -21.4% |
| Cores | 24 | 24 (8P+16E) | — |
| TDP (base W) | 280 | 150 | — |
| L3 cache (MB) | 128 | 36 | — |
- Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is slower than Core i9 14900KS by 46.5% in single-core and slower by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Core i9 14900KS draws less power (150W vs 280W base TDP).
Verdict: Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Core i9 14900KS?
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X advantages
- Cache size (+72%)
Core i9 14900KS advantages
- Single-core speed (+47%)
- Multi-core speed (+21%)
- Power efficiency (+46%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X if you play cache-sensitive games or run data-heavy workloads.
- Choose the Core i9 14900KS if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Core i9 14900KS: which should you choose?
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — 24-core AMD processor scoring 77 single-core and 1921 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 280 W TDP and 128 MB L3 cache.
Core i9 14900KS — 24-core Intel processor (8P+16E) scoring 144 single-core and 2443 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 150 W TDP and 36 MB L3 cache.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Core i9 14900KS: Core i9 14900KS leads in multi-core performance. Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is slower than Core i9 14900KS by 46.5% in single-core and slower by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 14900KS draws less power (150W vs 280W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Core i9 14900KS leads there with a single-core score of 144 versus 77, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Core i9 14900KS is stronger, posting 2,443 multi-core against 1,921 in Cinebench 2024. Its 24 cores (8 performance + 16 efficiency) give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Core i9 14900KS is the more efficient chip at 150 W versus 280 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X better than the Core i9 14900KS?
Core i9 14900KS is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is slower than Core i9 14900KS by 46.5% in single-core and slower by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and the Core i9 14900KS?
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is slower than Core i9 14900KS by 46.5% in single-core and slower by 21.4% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Core i9 14900KS draws less power (150W vs 280W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X if you play cache-sensitive games or run data-heavy workloads. Choose the Core i9 14900KS if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.