Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 single-core | 115 | 114 | +0.9% |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | 1,119 | +65.8% |
| Cores | 16 | 8 | — |
| TDP (base W) | 45 | 120 | — |
| L3 cache (MB) | 64 | 96 | — |
- Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 0.9% in single-core and faster by 65.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
- Ryzen AI Max+ 395 draws less power (45W vs 120W base TDP).
Verdict: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 advantages
- Multi-core speed (+40%)
- Power efficiency (+63%)
Ryzen 7 7800X3D advantages
- Cache size (+33%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
- Choose the Ryzen 7 7800X3D if you play cache-sensitive games or run data-heavy workloads.
- Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: which should you choose?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — 16-core AMD processor scoring 115 single-core and 1855 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 45 W TDP and 64 MB L3 cache.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D — 8-core AMD processor scoring 114 single-core and 1119 multi-core in Cinebench 2024, with a 120 W TDP and 96 MB L3 cache.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 leads in multi-core performance. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 0.9% in single-core and faster by 65.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI Max+ 395 draws less power (45W vs 120W base TDP).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 leads there with a single-core score of 115 versus 114, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is stronger, posting 1,855 multi-core against 1,119 in Cinebench 2024. Its 16 cores give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the more efficient chip at 45 W versus 120 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 takes the overall edge, though Ryzen 7 7800X3D wins in specific areas worth weighing. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 0.9% in single-core and faster by 65.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024).
What is the main difference between the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is faster than Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 0.9% in single-core and faster by 65.8% in multi-core (Cinebench 2024). Ryzen AI Max+ 395 draws less power (45W vs 120W base TDP).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking. Choose the Ryzen 7 7800X3D if you play cache-sensitive games or run data-heavy workloads.
Methodology
Processors are compared on Cinebench 2024 single-core and multi-core scores from published leaderboard results, alongside core configuration (performance + efficiency cores), base TDP, L3 cache, PassMark CPU Mark, 1080p gaming scores and street pricing where measured. Cinebench reflects rendering-style workloads; gaming performance depends heavily on the GPU and the specific title, so treat single-core standing as directional. Figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.